🔥Global crude oil supply is under a "double squeeze," the real change is that stability is vanishing.

If you look at a single attack, it seems more like a routine event in a geopolitical conflict.

But when you stretch the timeline, you'll find the problem isn't simple.

On one side, the Middle East situation is affecting key shipping routes,

on the other, Russia's core export ports are being hit.

When these two things happen simultaneously, the market is no longer facing a localized risk, but:

The continuity of the global supply system is beginning to be challenged.

First, look at the Russian side.

Primorsk is Russia's largest oil export terminal in the Baltic Sea, with a daily handling capacity of about 1.5 million barrels.

It's not just a transportation node, but a crucial channel for Russia to maintain exports under the sanctions regime.

When an incident occurs at this port, and Ust-Luga also suspends operations, coupled with previous disruptions at Black Sea ports, it means:

Multiple key export routes are experiencing simultaneous disruptions.

This is not a single-point problem, but continuous pressure on the export system.

Now look at the Middle East.

The Strait of Hormuz handles about 20% of global oil transportation.

Once transportation is restricted, the "buffer mechanism" the market originally relied on will be weakened.

Putting these two lines together, the real change is:

In the past, the market assumed that global energy supply was substitutable.

If one place had a problem, other regions could make up for it.

But the current situation is:

Uncertainty is emerging simultaneously in the two most critical supply regions.

This directly compresses the system's redundancy.

I'm more concerned about three impacts.

First, the price volatility structure

Short-term volatility is inevitable, but more importantly:

The frequency of volatility and uncertainty may increase.

Second, inventory and alternative routes

When supply is unstable, the market will rely on inventory and alternative transportation.

But these are inherently limited and cannot replace core channels in the long term.

Third, risk premium

Energy prices are starting to incorporate more "geopolitical risk pricing."

This will transmit to:

Inflation

Interest rate expectations

Overall asset prices

But the more critical question is:

Is this a one-time shock, or the beginning of continuous disruptions?

If it's a short-term event, the market will gradually recover.

If shocks persist, the energy system will be forced to adjust its structure.

So what I care more about is not the event itself, but two variables:

How long will supply recovery take

Will similar disruptions repeat

Because what truly changes the market is never a single shock, but shocks becoming normalized.

If this "double squeeze" continues, are you more inclined to think it's just a phase of volatility, or is the global energy system entering a new, more unstable phase?

I'll share more latest news later, please turn on notifications so you don't miss any important information.