I'm dead, maybe PDD will no longer track my parents for money.
FistsUnchained doesn't care about female virtues. In today's society, the issue of protecting the rights and interests of workers is receiving increasing attention from the public. Recently, a former Pinduoduo (PDD) employee named "草娃" faced immense pressure from the company's claim of 280,000 yuan. In despair, she uttered these words: "Even if I die, maybe PDD won't come after my parents for money." The controversy surrounding a former PDD employee's non-compete dispute has attracted attention. On March 6, 2024, a post from Weibo user "草娃故事" sparked widespread social concern. The user shared her experience as a former PDD employee who, after complying with the non-compete clause, was claimed 280,000 yuan by the company for violating the agreement. This incident has sparked heated discussions online and raised questions about the labor environment in Chinese internet companies. The non-compete clause controversy arises. 草娃， a girl born in a rural area of Jiangxi in 1999, joined PDD in July 2022 as a procurement and sales specialist after graduating from university. After working at the company for 8 months, her health deteriorated due to long working hours, leading her to resign. Upon resignation, she was forced to comply with a 9-month non-compete clause by the company and received a monthly compensation of 2,400 yuan. However, after receiving compensation for 6 months, 草娃 received a labor arbitration application initiated by PDD, demanding payment of 280,000 yuan in compensation. Confusion under the legal framework. As a recent graduate, 草娃 expressed shock and confusion about the sudden claim.
From FistsUnchained, it's reported that in today's society, the issue of protecting workers' rights is receiving increasing attention from the public. Recently, a former Pinduoduo (PDD) employee named "草娃" faced immense pressure from the company to pay back 280,000 yuan, leading to a desperate statement: "Even if I die, maybe PDD won't go after my parents for money."
Former PDD Employee's Non-compete Dispute Draws Attention
On March 6, 2024, a post from Weibo user "草娃故事" sparked widespread social concern. The user shared their experience as a former PDD employee who, after complying with a non-compete clause, was sued by the company for 280,000 yuan for alleged breach of contract. This incident has stirred discussions online and raised questions about the working environment in Chinese internet companies.
Dispute Arising from Non-compete Clause
"草娃，" a girl born in a rural area of Jiangxi in 1999, joined PDD in July 2022 after graduating from university, working as a procurement and sales specialist. After 8 months of work, her health suffered due to long working hours, leading her to resign.
Upon resignation, she was subjected to a 9-month non-compete clause by the company and received a monthly compensation of 2400 yuan.
However, after receiving compensation for 6 months, she received a labor arbitration application from PDD, demanding a payment of 280,000 yuan.
Confusion within Legal Framework
"草娃" expressed shock and confusion as a recent graduate facing this unexpected claim. In seeking legal assistance, she attempted to settle with the company by offering to pay 50,000 yuan in compensation, but her offer was rejected. An arbitrator in Changning, Shanghai, pointed out that "50,000 yuan is not acceptable in Shanghai," and the arbitration decision still stood at 280,000 yuan. Helpless, "草娃" had no choice but to pursue legal action.
Public Attention and Discussion
Following the escalation of the incident, "草娃" tried to voice her concerns on various social media platforms but faced complaints, post deletions, and account suspensions. Her Weibo post attracted widespread attention, with many netizens expressing outrage at her situation, while others raised questions and criticisms.The Grass Doll confessed that in the face of pressure and despair, he once had suicidal thoughts.
Advocating for Labor Rights Protection
This incident reflects the helplessness of workers when facing immense corporate power, as well as potential loopholes in labor laws in practical implementation.
The Grass Doll's experience has sparked public concern for the protection of workers' rights, prompting people to consider how to balance the operational needs of businesses with the personal rights of employees. Currently, this incident is still unfolding, and society is hopeful for a fair and reasonable resolution that brings hope to the Grass Doll and other workers who may face similar situations.